Re: Summary from yesterdays (mini) FESCo meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 30 December 2006 06:00, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Why does it have to be all or nothing? So you either just stamp off a
> package review with a terse aproval notice or have to write a book on
> it? Try to find a middle ground, which is posting a checklist and
> anything else you want to post. Other people have done this
> successfully, check their reviews.

The checklist is just a condensed version of the guidelines, that will be 
copied pasted.  It is no more valuable than a 'APPROVED'.  Anybody could 
copy/paste the checklist, especially if there are items that don't apply 
(python checks for a perl package).  The only thing it would prove is that 
they copied the most recent checklist.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgp1RFT8bgfbU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux