Rex Dieter wrote:
Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 07:43 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Because, frankly, poo-pooing the current proposal/guidelines in favor
of some handy-wavy theoretical lacking-actual-implementation
solution, is no solution.
Well, the point is, the current proposal does not address the "multiple
packages needlessly updating caches multiple times" problem at all.
Fair enough, I'll investigate hooking into rpm's %posttrans hooks. My
findings so far are promising.
I formally withdraw the iconcache proposal as-is, pending investigation
of the previously unaddressed "needlessly updating cache multiple times"
issue.
-- Rex
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
