On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 07:43 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Because, frankly, poo-pooing the current proposal/guidelines in favor of > some handy-wavy theoretical lacking-actual-implementation solution, is > no solution. Well, the point is, the current proposal does not address the "multiple packages needlessly updating caches multiple times" problem at all. Thus people are questioning what problem this proposal actually solves. Also, I think people are wary of going through with the proposed change, only to have to go back through and change it all *again* once we Fix The Real Problem(TM).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
