Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rex Dieter (rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
But this doesn't 'solve' anything, or 'simiplify' anything - it just
moves a touch into the shell script, and renames the command, and makes
things slower.
I'd bet the performance difference is not even measurable, so I don't
think it's worth arguing that.
time to do touch && gtk-update-icon-cache, with cache warm, average,
five runs: .166
time to do xdg-icon-resource..., with cache warm, average, five runs:
.270
62% slower.
My typical results using both (on a not-so-hot laptop):
# time /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache --force /usr/share/icons/hicolor
Cache file created successfully.
real 0m0.637s
user 0m0.492s
sys 0m0.145s
# time /usr/bin/xdg-icon-resource forceupdate --theme hicolor
real 0m0.657s
user 0m0.491s
sys 0m0.166s
Not nearly as big a difference as your findings.
-- Rex
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
