On Fri, 2006-08-12 at 08:12 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On 12/8/06, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What is the plan for dealing with java? AFAIK, FDS doesn't run without > > proprietary java. > > FDS runs fine its some of the management tools that don't. And while > it requires proprietary java to run the code itself isn't proprietary, > not an ideal situation I know but I'm sure they're working on it. I know Tom Fitzsimmons looked into this and I was pretty sure that the tools *did* run with recent Classpath/libgcj snapshots. Tom? Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
