Axel Thimm schrieb: > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 11:00:16AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> Axel.Thimm AT ATrpms.net: >>> smart >>> FE4 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc4 > 0:0.42-39.fc6) >>> FE5 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc5 > 0:0.42-39.fc6) >>> FE6 > FE7 (0:0.42-40.fc6 > 0:0.42-39.fc6) >> I wonder if it would be reasonable to suppress rawhide in this report >> until we get closer to test time. Since rawhide occasionally doesn't >> build, and maintainers often concentrate on released versions when >> fixing important bugs or pushing security fixes, the information often >> isn't pertinent. > FWIW the smart build fails on KDE not liking the newest autoconf: > [...] Why can't you simply run autofoo on a FC-6 machine, create a patch, bzip2 it and import it to the look aside cache and then use it as %patch from the spec file? That what several people recommend on different fedora-lists in the past, as they say "it's bad to run autofoo in a spec file". CU thl -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
