On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 09:56 +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:15:42AM -0800, Wart wrote: > > This list is missing 'readline-devel'. The base 'readline' package does > > not require libtermcap, but if you look at the spec file, you'll see > > that 'readline-devel' Requires: libtermcap-devel. This means that any > > package that has a BR: readline-devel likely gets linked with and ends > > up with an implicit Requires: on libtermcap... > > readline-devel-5.2-2.fc7 requires ncurses-devel. While at it, now that there's (AFAIU) only one alternative providing the termcap stuff in the distro, would it be possible to also get rid of undefined non-weak symbols in libreadline by explicitly linking it with libncurses? $ ldd -d -r /usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5 | grep undef undefined symbol: PC (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: UP (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: BC (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: tgetflag (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: tgetent (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: tputs (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: tgoto (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: tgetnum (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) undefined symbol: tgetstr (/usr/lib64/libreadline.so.5) -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
