On 11/19/06, Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've recently (last week or so) been given the maintainership of a bunch of packages, including libgpod. I'm always overloaded with work, but I will try to take a look at these problems. Of course, I have never even looked at these packages before, so I could use help as much as possible. :)
There are multiple people who have spun up out-of-tree updates of libgpod now. it should be enough to read through the comments on the bugs I referenced previously. One of the bugs I reference, should even has a spec to roll the new 0.4 version, producing the python bindings as a subpackage in Core without requiring the python-eye3d from extras. There is community work being done to address this, but like I said, there has been a lack of comment from maintainerside through bugzilla so far, so I was concerned that there was a maintainership breakdown and this was falling through the cracks. At the very least you should talk to the maintainer for listen in Extras for coordination if an update gets pushed. It really doesn't matter where the python bindings live, Core or Extras, but libgpod needs to be updated to atleast 0.3.2 in fc6 if not 0.4 to make the bindings buildable inside Fedora-space. -jef"puts away his eye-poking stick"spaleta -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
