Re: Does libgpod have a (pro)active maintainer in Core?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 10:52 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> There are a couple of issues with libgpod that are affecting multiple
> packages in Extras and Core at the moment that I want to make sure
> people are aware about the problem.  An upgrade to the latest version
> needs to be considered for at least fc6, and there needs to be a
> decision on how to handle the currently unshipped python bindings.

I've recently (last week or so) been given the maintainership of a bunch
of packages, including libgpod. I'm always overloaded with work, but I
will try to take a look at these problems. Of course, I have never even
looked at these packages before, so I could use help as much as
possible. :)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl@xxxxxxxxxx    alla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
He's a fiendish vegetarian gentleman spy on the edge. She's a mistrustful 
bisexual snake charmer who dreams of becoming Elvis. They fight crime! 

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux