On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 07:31 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > But when FESCo is really needed to decide on something, I'd like the > > official decision to be documented clearly more like this > > > > Summary of the proposal: [...] > > Pro: 10/13 > > Contra: 2/13 (thl, jwb) > > Absent: 1/13 (awjb) > > > > plus a summary of how exactly thl and jwb disagreed. > > > > And the whole thing announced via e-mail or on a separate "FESCo > > Announcements" page. It is most interesting to learn what _community > > representatives_ within FESCo think. > > I find this to be a good suggestion. The information is all in the > meeting logs already, but one has to read the whole log to find it. A > summary like you describe would be quite nice. I agree also. This would be extra work, but I think the benefits would be worth it, since it would give a clearer view of our voting. /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
