On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > I do think btw this repo shouldn't use the Fedora name, I would like it > to use the Fedora infrastructure, and maybe even be added to > Fedora-release (disabled by default), but it doesn't deserve to use the > Fedora name :) There is another important reason such a non-Fedora repository might be useful - there is a huge amount of material available under creative commons variants which is not software but is redistributable although not in the "free software" definition. The number and quantity of such data sets is only going to grow, and unlike software there are many where the logic of licensing is not the same as software (eg fiction books) Alan -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
