On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 13:15 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > I am reluctantly in Mr. Stone's camp here. > > Reluctantly, because the strident nature of the evolution of this thread > has obscured what I find to be a real issue: the question of what is and > isn't "blessed" in the universe of Fedora packages. > > There are *a lot* of people don't quite understand how packages work -- > and they certainly don't understand the ramifications of using a repo that > overwrites packages from Core. > > I don't think it's unreasonable to package this plugin. I don't even > think it's unreasonable to enable it by default; I certainly think it's a > potentially worthwhile discussion. > > Is it a sensible compromise to include this plug-in by default for now? I think it's sensible to include the plugin in the Fedora package. Whether it should be enabled by default or not... dunno. josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
