On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:35:03AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 00:37 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > but there's no 'censure' process if that's what you're gunning for. > > > > No, censoring is always bad, that doesn't mean that such behaviour > > shouldn't be counteracted. > > Censor != Censure. > > I think that censure probably was what you had in mind. There was a misunderstanding, it never occured to me (and obviously other according to the replies) that there are two expressions sounding so much alike. If I understand correctly there is: censuring: To criticize severely censoring: To examine and expurgate (most probably they sound identical) In light of that, I'll refine my sentence: "Yes, someone misbehaving to some extent needs to be censured, e.g. criticized like in this thread, no, censoring is always bad, e.g. no removal of bugzilla comments". -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpTZC1I33e46.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
