Re: devel packages with only one .pc file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 08:45 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> You all realize that the amount of time spent on this thread so far is
> about 10x greater than it would have been to just fix the packages to
> match the policy, right?

But time spent to understand the policy and the reasoning behind it is
priceless compared to just blindly following writ and not knowing why
other than 'because it says to...'

I encourage anybody that doesn't understand why we set up policy or
disagrees with policy to bring it up and discuss it.  It is better to
understand or even shed new light on a policy decision that may not have
been the best decision.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux