On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 05:11 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:30:40AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > It is definitely not free software as defined by the OSI, and also because > > > it is really not fres software: there are restrictions about using it > > > on some platforms. > > As well as is Qt (QPL). > > The QPL license doesn't restrict the platforms. As a developer you can't contribute to QPL/GPL'ed (and other dual/multiply licensed) packages back upstream without leaving the GPL. => Non-free sources. It's the reason for me to want participate into KDE and not contribute any patches to KDE/Qt based works. > If you want you can port > the free Qt to windows. Yes, ... > It isn't as if anybody uses motif any more except > xpdf Agreed wrt. new OpenSource works, but many entities still have (in-house, never publically released) packages around. Ralf -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
