On Friday, 18 August 2006 at 23:30, Rahul wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:58:39PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > >>THE KNOWNS (2): > >>Packages with non-free licenses that need to be taken out of Fedora Core > >>and moved to Fedora Extras (or trashed entirely) > >>####################################################################### > >>openmotif-* || Open Group Public || Bugzilla 202527 > > > >openmotif doesn't seems to me to be free enough to be in fedora extras, > >since it hasn't an OSI compatible licence. > > > > Fedora Core packages dependent on openmotif are xpdf, ddd. tetex-xdvi, > mesa-libGLw as stated in the above bug report. If there are many > packages dependent on openmotif in Fedora Extras we could do this as a > two step process. > > * Move all openmotif dependencies and openmotif itself into Fedora Extras > * Fix or drop packages as necessary. > > The advantage of moving it into Fedora Extras is that the broader > community of packages can work on this and resolve things faster. Too bad. I'm working on getting a package (opendx) which depends on openmotif into Extras. Any viable openmotif replacements? Regards, R. -- Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski MPlayer developer http://rpm.greysector.net/mplayer/ "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
