Rahul wrote: > Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 03:58:39PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: >>> THE KNOWNS (2): >>> Packages with non-free licenses that need to be taken out of Fedora Core >>> and moved to Fedora Extras (or trashed entirely) >>> ####################################################################### >>> openmotif-* || Open Group Public || Bugzilla 202527 >> >> openmotif doesn't seems to me to be free enough to be in fedora >> extras, since it hasn't an OSI compatible licence. >> > > Fedora Core packages dependent on openmotif are xpdf, ddd. tetex-xdvi, > mesa-libGLw as stated in the above bug report. If there are many > packages dependent on openmotif in Fedora Extras we could do this as a > two step process. > > * Move all openmotif dependencies and openmotif itself into Fedora Extras > * Fix or drop packages as necessary. > > The advantage of moving it into Fedora Extras is that the broader > community of packages can work on this and resolve things faster. > My idea exactly. Although I don't know how feasible this is for mesa-libGLw . Regards, Hans -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
