Ralf Corsepius wrote: > If Fedora is heading down the same lane, there isn't much reason for > Fedora to exist. Don't say such things! Fedora's insistence on using only F/OSS while being (mostly) user-friendly is one of its greatest strong points, IMHO. It shows how beneficial such licensing can be, and is a perfect example of a stable and secure, yet highly-updated distribution. >> It is definitely not free software as defined by the OSI, and also because >> it is really not fres software: there are restrictions about using it >> on some platforms. > As well as is Qt (QPL). Qt 3 was dual-licensed for X11 (and OS X, too?) a long time ago (QPL and GPL). It is under the GPL that Fedora distributes it in tandem with other applications. (IIRC, Qt 4 is GPL'ed on Windows too.) My two cents... -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
