>>>>> "FN" == Fernando Nasser <fnasser@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: FN> Java is an architecture that includes distributed components and FN> several things like that. More to the level of CORBA and, excuse FN> me for the word, .NET. OK, well they don't have separate package groups either. FN> So, it is not a language like Perl or Python but a complete FN> subsystem. I'm sorry, I think I've taken a wrong turn at Albuquerque and wandered onto the Sun marketing list. Back to reality, it seems to me to be imminently reasonable that Java should have its own package group because there are a quantity of packages associated with it, but to argue that Java alone deserves such treatment while other languages in the same situation don't because they're not "subsystems" seems, well, odd. - J< -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
