Hi Jason,
Java s not a language. I wish sometimes the language part of it had
been called J# or something like that.
Java is an architecture that includes distributed components and several
things like that. More to the level of CORBA and, excuse me for the
word, .NET.
So, it is not a language like Perl or Python but a complete subsystem.
Regards,
Fernando
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"AG" == Anthony Green <green@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
AG> Is it really ok to use Development/Libraries/Java?
We (ultimately the packaging committee and then the various other
committees but currently everyone) need to figure out what to do here.
There are many more groups used by Core than have been permitted in
Extras; I personally think the Extras list is way too small but I'm
not sure if Java should get its own package group. Would we have
separate groups for the other languages? (There are several hundred
Perl modules in Extras alone.)
- J<
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
