On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:48:57 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > On 6/27/06, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Don't. It sounds wrong. There is a packaging error or library > > naming mistake here somewhere. Can you make available the src.rpm > > in a working location? Or post the output of "rpm -qlvp" for both > > binary builds. > > > > Sorry, here is a working location: > http://chitlesh.ch.funpic.de/katapult/ Okay, thanks. First of all, the package didn't build because it's missing to source /etc/profile.d/qt.sh and hence failed to find Qt: %build unset QTDIR || : ; . /etc/profile.d/qt.sh export QTLIB=${QTDIR}/lib QTINC=${QTDIR}/include ... The package needs more work, since the katapult-devel package is not needed. It includes files which are not needed. > Chitlesh(i386)[0]$su -c "rpm -Uvh katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386.rpm " > Password: > error: Failed dependencies: > libkatapult.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386 > libkatapultcatalog.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386 > libkatapultdisplay.so.0 is needed by katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386 Cannot confirm (FC5). $ rpm -qpR /home/misc5/tmp/rpm/RPMS/katapult-0.3.1.3-3.i386.rpm | grep kata.*so libkatapult.so.1 libkatapultcatalog.so.1 libkatapultdisplay.so.1 When building your package, did you have old katapult libraries installed, which were linked against instead of the included ones? I see a bad -L/usr/lib in the build log.
