On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 00:21 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Ralf Corsepius (rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 23:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > The following packages: > > > > > > - have no dependencies in Core > > > - are not in comps > > > - are not subpackages of something in comps > > > > > > Hence, the question is - should they stay in core? > > ??? Many of them are utilities ... I should have said "optional utilities", being important/helpful in individual setups. > If they're important enough to be part of Core, they (theoretically) > should be important enough to be in comps *somewhere*. The fact they have not been, indicates users using them must have installed them otherwise (esp. w/o anaconda) ;) Ralf
