Ralf Corsepius (rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 23:54 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > The following packages: > > > > - have no dependencies in Core > > - are not in comps > > - are not subpackages of something in comps > > > > Hence, the question is - should they stay in core? > ??? Many of them are utilities ... If they're important enough to be part of Core, they (theoretically) should be important enough to be in comps *somewhere*. Bill
