Re: libxml v1 dependencies (was: Re: multilib fun - devel packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 16 December 2005 16:44, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 16.12.2005, 10:00 -0500 schrieb Christopher Blizzard:
> > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 12:21 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > > than you lose by dropping it out of
> > > > Core.
> > >
> > > ...if we do it *now*. There will be a lot of bad press about Fedora
> > > then. I'd like to avoid that. And avoiding that is quite easy afaics if
> > > we just wait another 6 or 12 month until anaconda can access
> > > fedora-extras via internet or from extras-iso-files that were burned on
> > > CD.
> > >
> > > Installing KDE should then be as smooth as it is now and nobody can
> > > complain that KDE is in "Fedora Extras -- the second class
> > > citizen" (they still will, but that's life). \
> >
> > I don't think it's an FC5 target.  Waaay too late for that.
>
> Sorry, maybe I was not clear enough on that (but where is I say FC5?). I
> said "avoid that ... wait another 6 or 12 month" -- so I meant FC6 or
> FC7 ;-)
>
> > (Strange, I've never through of Extras as second class.)
>
> No, it is not. But Google says:
>  Results 1 - 23 of about 80 for "Fedora Extras" "second class citizen".

I get 78, OK, two less to worry about. ;-) (I know, I know about differences 
in google searches)

The funny part is that some of those intend to rebut that, so they should 
probably use other words. ;-)

-- 
José Abílio


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux