Re: multilib fun - devel packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2005, 19:12 -0500 schrieb seth vidal:
> On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 16:23 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Can a similar report be generated for Extras?
> we don't ship any multilib pkgs in extras at all.
> 
> and if it is possible hopefully we can keep it that way! :)

I'd like to propose one (or in fact: two) i386 package for the extras
x86_64 tree: wine. It's under development/review in Bug 171526. This
would require that we put lcms.i386 from extras in the x86_64 tree, too.
All other i386 deps are in core afaics.

wine.x86_64 itself should not be build, because that does not
compile/work currently (afaik). It would be pretty pointless anyway
because it could only run x64 binaries.


Disclaimer: No, I'm not interested in wine. I have used WinOS/2 long
enough to try to avoid similar things. But I got involved in this
discussion somehow...

CU
thl
-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux