Am Donnerstag, den 08.12.2005, 19:12 -0500 schrieb seth vidal: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 16:23 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Can a similar report be generated for Extras? > we don't ship any multilib pkgs in extras at all. > > and if it is possible hopefully we can keep it that way! :) I'd like to propose one (or in fact: two) i386 package for the extras x86_64 tree: wine. It's under development/review in Bug 171526. This would require that we put lcms.i386 from extras in the x86_64 tree, too. All other i386 deps are in core afaics. wine.x86_64 itself should not be build, because that does not compile/work currently (afaik). It would be pretty pointless anyway because it could only run x64 binaries. Disclaimer: No, I'm not interested in wine. I have used WinOS/2 long enough to try to avoid similar things. But I got involved in this discussion somehow... CU thl -- Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
