On Aug 4, 2005, Matthias Saou <thias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And I now realize that what I did is plain wrong, since as Michael pointed > out, someone wanting to check out the CVS files for the "1.fc3" package > will use the tag where the patch is missing. So I definitely won't do it > again ;-) And now that you know you can fix tags, you may go ahead and fix the 1.fc3 tag such that it matches what was actually built :-) -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}