On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 06:09 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:04:34PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > Convenient access to dangerous options bears an unknown risk, IMO.
Seconded.
> There is no point to bump %{release} as rpm with that %{release}
> hasn't ever been built.
Well, we're not running out of numbers to use in the release tag, so it
doesn't hurt anything either, and works better than force-tagging in the
"fundamentals of version control" sense.
