On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 01:55 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 01:54 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > The ones right now are: > > > > > > a2ps -vs- enscript > > > > well from the standpoint of code actually being more actively > > maintained. > > > > a2ps was last updated 2 yrs ago, according to the website. > > enscript was last updated 5 yrs ago. > > okay I typed that backward. > > enscript - updated 2 yrs ago > a2ps - updated 5yrs ago. > > sorry > > so maybe it's best to move a2ps to extras. > Doesn't 2 vs. 5 years seem sort of academic? Degrees of deadness. ;-) Havoc
