Re: picking the best option from similar packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: picking the best option from similar packages
From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:36:06 +0200
In-reply-to: <1109919349.23585.50.camel@cutter>
References: <20050304064235.GB5707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1109919276.23585.48.camel@cutter> <1109919349.23585.50.camel@cutter>
Reply-to: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 01:55 -0500, seth vidal wrote:

> so maybe it's best to move a2ps to extras.

...and update enscript to 1.6.4, that version has some nifty features
that are used eg. by ViewCVS/CVSweb for HTML colorization of various
file formats.

References:
- picking the best option from similar packages
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: picking the best option from similar packages
  - From: seth vidal
- Re: picking the best option from similar packages
  - From: seth vidal

Prev by Date: package functionality - is it a core feature?
Next by Date: Re: picking the best option from similar packages
Previous by thread: Re: picking the best option from similar packages
Next by thread: Re: picking the best option from similar packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux