On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: >On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 19:39 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: >> > the only item we might want to delay a tiny bit on is gcc->gcc4. >> >> This has now happened, yeah! :-) > >Let's give it a little time to settle -- let Fedora Core be the canary >for gcc4 issues and build Extras once, when the compiler is done. I read that as "conary" for a minute, and thought you were suggesting we use conary for FC4. ;) Might not be a bad idea even. ;o) -- Mike A. Harris, Systems Engineer - X11 Development team, Red Hat Canada, Ltd. IT executives rate Red Hat #1 for value: http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor
