On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 16:12 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >Tom 'spot' Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> I'm just trying to avoid the "You broke my printer" flames. >> >> It could very well be the case that the gimp-print-cups drivers are >> superior (or inferior) to the alternate drivers in Core, and if so, we >> may be regressing for some printers. > >Perhaps I'm not being clear. They're the *exact same drivers* as the >other Core drivers; it's just PPDs used for manual setup as opposed >to using the print tool. (Tim, please correct me if I'm mistaken.) If they're exactly the same, then I suppose the need for including them in Extras isn't urgent. I think it should still go on the orphaned list. ~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
