On 07. 11. 19 13:33, Paul Frields wrote:
That's exactly what it says. I don't think we want to direct users to use an ancient version or something that's soon to be retired.
And known to be insecure. I don't think we should do that.
Perhaps the article should be updated to use an upstream provided package, or another alternative?
I don't want to discuss whether recommending that is a good marketing for Fedora, but we definitively need to switch the recommended installation method, or postpone the article until a new maintainer is found (and only change the method if there is none).
-- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
