> I don't think I should pull it out at this point, nor should I rewrite it. In the current state the article is misleading. It seems that we can agree that packit doesn't "auto-package". > Also, I don't want to add a note such as "Editor's note: packit doesn't > actually generate a SPEC file for you." because that wouldn't feel good. So > I think I just leave it as it is at this point? Any better ideas? Leaving the article as it is, is definitely the worst options. If editing "wouldn't feel good" then the article should be remove immediately. Otherwise it will stay at least online for two more days till something is done. I'm all for editing because nobody will complain about clarification. Kind regards, Fabian _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
