On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 2:40 PM Akarshan Biswas <akarshan.biswas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8.9.2018 22:45, Sai Praneeth Reddy wrote: > > > > A bit off topic: > > > > If you are trying to put this package to rpmfusion, is it for legal > > reasons? If so, prepare for this copr repo to be deleted any time. > > > > Copr shares the same legal rules as Fedora. > > > Hi. > I already sent an email here but it is not showing. Anyway, > > The copr repo is compiled without restricted codecs(All the restricted code is already deleted before uploading) for testing. But since most of web streams restricted codec aka h264 video. The purpose of this copr repo doesn't met as only youtube streams vp9. This is why the project is moving to a separate package with all the restricted codecs on rpmfusion. I'm perhaps not clear on what the coverage is here. Is this article meant to cover the upstream codebase, or a legally OK Fedora or COPR codebase? The Magazine can't point users at code that's not legal for them to run. -- Paul _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
