Part 2 has been updated to clarify the objectives and tasks presented in part 1. Let me know if you feel it requires further revisions. Regards, Shaun Assam On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 15:15 +0000, Shaun Assam wrote: > Hi Paul, I've noticed the comments and have responded to them. I knew > going into the article some people might not understand the > technicalities of optimizing sound quality. The comments and feedback > have helped with clarifying that for the average audio listener. > > It seems there's a blur between the lines. The sentence begining > with, > “By eliminating Pulseaudio…” should be a new paragraph. Are we able > to > fix this post-publish? > > I will review part 2 tonight and add a recap in the beginning briefly > explaining the purpose for the audio tweaking from part 1 and it's > relation to the second part. > > Regards, > > Shaun Assam > > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:07 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:08:18PM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > Part 2 of the DIY Digital Jukebox article is ready for review at > > > https: > > > //fedoramagazine.org/?p=19529&preview=1&_ppp=836e4b4558 > > > > > > Let me know if it requires additional editing. > > > > Thank you Shaun. There seem to be a number of comments on Part 1 > > which it may be helpful for you to review and comment on. > > > > For instance, it's not clear to people yet why the real-time > > component > > is important for the jukebox. So that would be something you'll > > want > > to cover in Part 2 for sure. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > g _______________________________________________ Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
