>>>>> Richard Fontana <rfontana@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > You aren't required to use a copyright notice with MIT-0, > or (if you think you need the copyright line for some reason, it's > certainly not required from a Fedora allowance or SPDX representation > perspective) you can put whatever you want in the copyright notice > like "Copyright I don't claim any copyright" or what have you. That is not at all clear, so thank you for saying that. > The Unlicense is a fairly popular non-license license that contains > "release into the public domain" rhetoric if that's what you're > looking for. We wouldn't recommend this but you can see that there are > zillions of legacy public domain dedication formulations that have > been allowed in Fedora. The Unlicense is very interesting; thanks for the reference. I think it basically says what I was trying to. Just to be clear, I'm reading the second sentence as a recommendation against just lifting one of the many public domain dedications that are allowed or coming up with my own, as opposed to being a recommendation against the Unlicense. -- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
