On 01/30/2011 09:13 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > I suspect that in the cases you are talking about, there is a key > difference: the work the company is distributing is a derivative work of > a GPL work copyrighted by another party, so that party can sue the > company for copyright infringement. But in the original case in this > thread, IguanaWorks is (we think) the sole copyright holder of the work > it is distributing. There is a difference in those two cases, as it is simpler for a copyright holder to go after an infringer, but I suspect from a contract perspective, the claim is equally valid. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
