>>>>> "OP" == Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: OP> Most of the drupal modules that I've looked into packaging do not OP> have any license preamble in the code. They contain a copy of the OP> GPLv2 license in LICENSE.txt. As such, I've marked them as GPLv2. Shouldn't that be GPL+? Obviously you should get clarification from upstream, but according to clause 9 of version 2 of the GPL text, you can choose any version at all: "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F OP> According to http://drupal.org/licensing/faq/#q4 modules on the OP> drupal.org cvs site should be GPLv2+, and I've had requests to OP> update the license tag: In the past we have referred to upstream web sites in the case that we had reasonable certainty that the web site and the code had the same author. Is that the case here? - J< _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
