Re: LGPL for noncommercial works only?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MM" == Matt McCutchen <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

MM> By the way, it's not clear to me whether the choice of GPLv3 rather
MM> than GPLv3+ was intentional.

The source is pretty explicitly GPLv3+.

MM> You might ask upstream whether they will grant GPLv3+, to to make
MM> things easier in the future.

I would expect the person submitting the package to do that.  (Of
course, I would expect them to ask these questions about the weird
licensing, too, but most people just don't care about licensing.)

 - J<
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux