On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For some time now, Fedora has been working with Red Hat Legal to come up > with a replacement for the Fedora Individual Contributor License > Agreement (aka, the Fedora ICLA). As a result, the Fedora Project > Contributor Agreement (FPCA) has been approved by Red Hat Legal, and is > now being presented to the Fedora Community for comments and discussion. Tom, Since any choice of a single default license for code is likely to be viewed by some as making some sort of a statement could you explain a little bit about the rationale for selecting the MIT License variant that was chosen as the initial default covering code contributions that are submitted without license preference? I presume Red Hat Legal is fine with any free license?! Who selected the MIT License? Thanks, John _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
