On 04/19/2010 05:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > I don't remember seeing information on whether the project preferred an > explicit or default license for spec files nor how to document a different > license for the spec file (presumably the license tag doesn't apply to it) > than for the remainder of the package. (A quick search didn't find anything > either, but there could be some documentation that I didn't find.) > > It would probably be a good idea to better document this in the packaging > guidelines. We don't care. It is entirely up to the contributor, neither is preferred, both are supported. ~spot _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
