-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, This article by the FSF is hardly fresh news, but I think its content is disturbing: Is it true that the Microsoft Community Promise really is only a covenant-not-to-sue (which does not have to be respected by any third party to whom any patents may be transferred), rather than a real patent licence? If this is the case, how does this effect Mono's place in Fedora? Doesn't this potentially make it an encumbered item? I use Mono and plan to be using it as a large part of my day-to-day work, so I would very much like to see it continue to be treated as a legitimate Fedora package. Thanks for any viewpoints! Blessings, Christopher Svanefalk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Charset: UTF8 Version: Hush 3.0 Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify wpwEAQMCAAYFAkuXffsACgkQQJM2U8zwlkaWNwP+NDKJHOe7zHjs6Cz0soVrAU5Tiogi Zd8SLzlGtYmETHz+GTlWq99DKvPNgtNO/GthDr2gwMbBz84YHqJHnqbyym0ZTHg2VIFq QoNHAhjIMTuRu/ob7BHCyPZliR8BfEtjOAFEZ6+36f/cevtH1MUMI/wp5EMuruRI8FMH di4Hp0o= =KgOf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
