"Microsoft's empty promise"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

This article by the FSF is hardly fresh news, but I think its
content is disturbing:

Is it true that the Microsoft Community Promise really is only a
covenant-not-to-sue (which does not have to be respected by any
third party to whom any patents may be transferred), rather than a
real patent licence? If this is the case, how does this effect
Mono's place in Fedora? Doesn't this potentially make it an
encumbered item?

I use Mono and plan to be using it as a large part of my day-to-day
work, so I would very much like to see it continue to be treated as
a legitimate Fedora package.

Thanks for any viewpoints!

Blessings,

Christopher Svanefalk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Charset: UTF8
Version: Hush 3.0
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify

wpwEAQMCAAYFAkuXffsACgkQQJM2U8zwlkaWNwP+NDKJHOe7zHjs6Cz0soVrAU5Tiogi
Zd8SLzlGtYmETHz+GTlWq99DKvPNgtNO/GthDr2gwMbBz84YHqJHnqbyym0ZTHg2VIFq
QoNHAhjIMTuRu/ob7BHCyPZliR8BfEtjOAFEZ6+36f/cevtH1MUMI/wp5EMuruRI8FMH
di4Hp0o=
=KgOf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux