On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Tim Waugh <twaugh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:19 -0800, Julius Davies wrote: >> In this case I think it's fine! Thanks so much for looking into this, >> and especially for providing a great picture of the actual connections >> between the binary files. I see this "backend/scsi" executable really >> does come from only scsi.c and scsi-linux.c. >> >> $ objdump -D -l cups-1.4.2/backend/scsi | grep cups-1.4.2 | sort >> >> /home/julius/cups/cups-1.4.2/backend/scsi.c:110 >> [etc....] >> /home/julius/cups/cups-1.4.2/backend/scsi-linux.c:112 >> [etc....] > > Well, and it dynamically links to libcups.so.2: > > $ ldd /usr/lib/cups/backend/scsi | grep cups > libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib64/libcups.so.2 (0x00007f19e21dd000) > > But that's OK? > > Tim. > */ > > Yeah, that's fine if libcups.so.2 is LGPL. -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
