Re: BSD copyright clause

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:31:45PM -0500, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> A GPL'ed project includes some 3 clause BSD licensed files. They include this 
> line:
> 
>  * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>  *    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>  *    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
> 
> Is the term "binary form" referring to the tarball or a compiled application 
> that uses the file? If it is meant to refer to a compiled app, how do people 
> typically meet this? Just curious....

My understanding is that "redistribution in binary form" covers the
total blob of material customarily used to redistribute to users in a
form they can execute.  So it would cover in our case a binary RPM
package, meaning you can include the license in the %{_docdir}.
That's what our binary RPMs are required to do IIRC.
 
-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
          Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux