Hi, I see the ftp-0.17-51.fc12.i686.rpm says it's "BSD With Advertising." This isn't the problem: it's all UC-Berkeley, so it can be relicensed to remove the "With Advertising" clause. My question is this: I also see that ftp links against libreadline.so: $ ldd ftp-0.17-51.fc12.i686/usr/bin/ftp libreadline.so.6 Is that okay for BSD code to dynamically link against GPL libraries? And a footnotes of one more package (rpcbind) that appears to have wrong info in its RPM license attribute: rpmquery --info -p rpcbind-0.2.0-4.fc12.i686.rpm License: GPL But we can only find BSD3 and BSD4 files inside it: rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/check_bound.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/pmap_svc.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/rpcbind.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/rpcb_stat.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/rpcb_svc_4.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/rpcb_svc.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/rpcb_svc_com.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/rpcinfo.c;BSD3;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/security.c;NONE rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/util.c;BSD4;,;0 rpcbind-0.2.0-4/rpcbind-0.2.0/src/warmstart.c;BSD3;,;0 -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
