On 18/02/10 07:53, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On 02/17/2010 02:07 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >> I seem to recall we've had similar situations in the past, in which an >> email from at least one of the upstream lead maintainers clarifying >> their intent sufficiently resolved the problem. Would it be difficult >> to get such an email? > > If upstream confirms (in writing) that this is a simple typo, then we're > okay, and we should get them to fix this upstream. If we don't want to > wait to pick up a new upstream fix, including a copy of the email > confirmation of licensing as %doc is sufficient. I guess this qualifies as "in writing": http://linuxwacom.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=linuxwacom/xf86-input-wacom;a=commit;h=0815cc870bc242756b6b9743d975f3c5dcb9d7e4 I'll rebase our package asap, thanks for the info. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
