Hi, My co-author detected some slight errors in some RPM license attributes. Errors listed below: abrt-0.0.11-2.fc12.i686.rpm License: GPLv2+ --- Our source file scan detected some GPLv2 (strict) files: abrt-0.0.11/lib/Plugins/Kerneloops.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 abrt-0.0.11/lib/Plugins/KerneloopsReporter.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 abrt-0.0.11/lib/Plugins/KerneloopsScanner.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 abrt-0.0.11/lib/Plugins/KerneloopsSysLog.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 abrt-0.0.11/lib/Utils/copyfd.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 abrt-0.0.11/lib/Utils/logging.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 abrt-0.0.11/lib/Utils/xfuncs.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 abrt-0.0.11/src/Hooks/dumpoops.cpp;GPLv2;,;0 eclipse-cdt-6.0.1-7.fc13.i686.rpm License: EPL and CPL --- We are unable to find any source files with CPL, although some documentation files in the source RPM do specify this license. mtools-4.0.12-1.fc13.i686.rpm License: GPLv2+ --- We are unable to find any source files that are GPLv2+. They appear to all be GPLv3+. ortp-0.16.1-1.fc13.i686.rpm License: LGPLv2+ and VSL --- We're less sure we found a problem with this one, but thought we'd let you know we're having trouble locating the source of the VSL licensing. Thanks very much for clarifying my understanding in that previous thread about a month ago! -- yours, Julius Davies 250-592-2284 (Home) 250-893-4579 (Mobile) http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
