Hi, I logged bug #563308[1] arguing that the RPM License: header "AGPLv3 with exceptions" wasn't accepted by rpmlint, and Ville Skytta mentioned that the Licensing page[2] on the fedoraproject.org wiki was authoritative for rpmlint. Following the Discussion topic[3] on that very same page, I hereby submit for your consideration the inclusion of RPM License header "AGPLv3 with exceptions". I understand that in this case, it's not as straightforward as with some of the other license, so I guess it's good to discuss here. The License: header we speak about here has been accepted in the case of Zarafa[4] package. Thank you in advance, Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563308 [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Discussion_of_Licensing [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
