On 02/06/2010 06:07 PM, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Umm, why would you package something that only contained such a file? >> I'm assuming it points to PHP PEAR code, why aren't you packaging that? > > I'm not packaging anything :) > > I'm asking the question for David Nalley, who asked the question of > me. To directly answer the question though, the PHP packaging > guidelines seem to require this - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_standard_channel.2Frepository > and there are many examples already in the package collection: Eh. Okay. Seems a silly thing to package standalone, but whatever. Use: License: Public Domain Since these channel files are not copyrightable, they can be treated as if they were in the public domain. ~spot _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
