On 02/05/2010 06:37 PM, Jon Stanley wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm going to say that the work you're describing is not copyrightable, >> thus, we don't need to worry too much about it being unlicensed. > > Cool, what would a license tag for a package that contained only such a file be? Umm, why would you package something that only contained such a file? I'm assuming it points to PHP PEAR code, why aren't you packaging that? ~spot _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
